June 8th, 2012
by F. Grey Parker
45 years ago today, the U.S. suffered a brutal military humiliation as the result of a sneak attack.
Most Americans have never heard of it.
The conspiracy-minded traffic in fringe theories about it.
What little discussion there actually is of the event often results in accusations of racial or cultural bias against those who have the nerve to bring it up at all.
But it did happen...
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts
Friday, June 8, 2012
The Attack We Do Not Speak Of
Labels: Liberal opinion, the hand that feeds you
anti-semitism,
casualties,
controversy,
denial,
Israel,
provocation,
remembrance,
silence,
six day war,
U.S.S. Liberty,
war,
warmongering
Monday, April 9, 2012
Banning Günter Grass
April 9th, 2012
Nobel Laureate Günter Grass has been declared persona non grata by the nation of Israel. The reason?
He wrote a poem.
Before going further, I suggest that you read it for yourselves HERE.
Personally, my only real criticism of the work is that (at the ripe age of 84) Mr Grass seems to have lost his artful touch. Perhaps its weakness lies in the translation.
As far as its substance is concerned, Grass has simply suggested that Israel's possession of an utterly opaque and never internationally inventoried nuclear arsenal "endangers an already fragile world peace." He has also decried the hypocrisy of their threatening an all-out war with Iran for maintaining the same refusal to allow transparency.
This is plainly rational. The response of Prime Minister Netanyahu's governing coalition is not. The Guardian reports:
Neither the ugly fact of Hitler's child victimization nor Grass' long support for Israel's right to exist has prevented some in the Netanyahu regime from painting a very different picture. The ultra-radical Yeshai went so far as to call for Grass' Nobel to "withdrawn."
The N.Y. Times reports on Grass' reaction:
Larry Durfner notes wryly:
Nobel Laureate Günter Grass has been declared persona non grata by the nation of Israel. The reason?
He wrote a poem.
Before going further, I suggest that you read it for yourselves HERE.
Personally, my only real criticism of the work is that (at the ripe age of 84) Mr Grass seems to have lost his artful touch. Perhaps its weakness lies in the translation.
As far as its substance is concerned, Grass has simply suggested that Israel's possession of an utterly opaque and never internationally inventoried nuclear arsenal "endangers an already fragile world peace." He has also decried the hypocrisy of their threatening an all-out war with Iran for maintaining the same refusal to allow transparency.
This is plainly rational. The response of Prime Minister Netanyahu's governing coalition is not. The Guardian reports:
"On Sunday, Israel's interior minister Eli Yishai used a law permitting a bar on entry to former Nazis to declare Grass persona non grata for his "attempt to fan the flames of hatred against the state of Israel and its people, and thus to advance the idea to which he publicly affiliated in his past donning of the SS uniform."With all due respect, Mr. Grass was born on October 16th, 1927. When Germany invaded Poland he was eleven years old. The Nazi regime's desperate conscription of children as their fortunes of war turned is well documented. Indeed, the total of Grass' combat experience lasted from February to April of 1945.
Neither the ugly fact of Hitler's child victimization nor Grass' long support for Israel's right to exist has prevented some in the Netanyahu regime from painting a very different picture. The ultra-radical Yeshai went so far as to call for Grass' Nobel to "withdrawn."
The N.Y. Times reports on Grass' reaction:
"Two days after his poem appeared, Mr. Grass said in an interview that he had meant to focus his attack not so much on Israel as on the policies of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
"The man who damages Israel the most at the moment is in my opinion Netanyahu, and I should have included that in my poem," Mr. Grass said. "What is now an imminent threat is a risk without parallel — a preventive strike, a first strike against Iran, which would have terrible consequences."The standard attack from Israel's American patrons on that country's critics is that 'they are the only free and Democratic nation in the Middle East.' How does barring the entry of a Nobel winner for the composition of a poem square with our supposed ideals?
Larry Durfner notes wryly:
"... in a way, he’s getting off easy; when ex-Mossad boss Meir Dagan started criticizing Netanyahu and Barak’s plan to bomb Iran, his diplomatic passport was revoked and some cabinet ministers demanded he be investigated for endangering national security.
So it doesn’t matter if Grass was in the Waffen SS (drafted at age 17 at the end of WWII). That makes him an easy target for Israel’s enforcers, but when you’re dealing with antiwar critics, any excuse will do: he’s a German, he’s a gentile, he’s a Jew who doesn’t live in Israel, he’s a fifth-column Jew living in Israel. Whatever. The point is to shut up criticism of Israel’s right to make war whenever and wherever it wants."
The American right is engaging in the same ugliness. Indeed, over at Pajamas Media, Benjamin Kerstein wrote recently that "all criticism of Israel not only can be but must be antisemitic." EMPHASIS HIS
And some wonder why I so rarely venture into this territory.
Labels: Liberal opinion, the hand that feeds you
anti-semitism,
avigdor lieberman,
banned,
banning,
censorship,
Eli Yeshai,
free speech,
Günter Grass,
Israel,
netanyahu,
Poem,
What Must Be Said
Monday, March 5, 2012
Will The GOP "Listen To The Generals"?
March 5th, 2012
As the right clamors more loudly everyday for war with Iran and against the backdrop of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's current visit to the U.S. comes this full page ad in today's Washington Post (via HuffPo) calling bullshit on a war of choice with Iran. It is signed by the following:
Major General Paul Eaton (USA, Ret.)
Tom Fingar, fmr. Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Analysis
Lt. General Robert G. Gard (USA, Ret.)
General Joseph Hoar (USMC, Ret.)
Brig. General John H. Johns (USA, Ret.)
Maj. Gen Rudolph Ostovich III (USA, Ret.)
Paul Pillar, fmr. National Intelligence Officer for the Near East and South Asia
Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson (USA, Ret.)
Click HERE for better view
As the right clamors more loudly everyday for war with Iran and against the backdrop of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's current visit to the U.S. comes this full page ad in today's Washington Post (via HuffPo) calling bullshit on a war of choice with Iran. It is signed by the following:
Major General Paul Eaton (USA, Ret.)
Tom Fingar, fmr. Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Analysis
Lt. General Robert G. Gard (USA, Ret.)
General Joseph Hoar (USMC, Ret.)
Brig. General John H. Johns (USA, Ret.)
Maj. Gen Rudolph Ostovich III (USA, Ret.)
Paul Pillar, fmr. National Intelligence Officer for the Near East and South Asia
Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson (USA, Ret.)
Click HERE for better view
![]() |
| From the National Iranian American Council |
Labels: Liberal opinion, the hand that feeds you
gop warmongering,
iran,
Israel,
listen to the generals,
netanyahu,
NIAC,
preemptive war,
preventive war,
war
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Worth 1,000 Words - Iran War Edition
Labels: Liberal opinion, the hand that feeds you
cartoon,
gop warmongering,
humor,
iran,
Israel,
political cartoon,
political humor,
war,
warmongering
Obama's "Most Dangerous" GOP Opponent?
Feb 29th, 2012
In light of the news that Israel would "not warn" the U.S. prior to a pre-emptive attack on Iran, Sullivan fumes:
"I don't think you can understand the Republican strategy for this election without factoring in a key GOP player, Benjamin Netanyahu.
He already has core members of the US Congress siding openly with him against the US president and the Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman - like McCain, Lieberman and Butters.
In light of the news that Israel would "not warn" the U.S. prior to a pre-emptive attack on Iran, Sullivan fumes:
"I don't think you can understand the Republican strategy for this election without factoring in a key GOP player, Benjamin Netanyahu.
He already has core members of the US Congress siding openly with him against the US president and the Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman - like McCain, Lieberman and Butters.
Labels: Liberal opinion, the hand that feeds you
Barack Obama,
GOP insanity,
gop politics,
gop warmongering,
iran,
Israel,
just war,
netanyahu,
pre-emptive war,
warmongering
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Netantahu - The "Anti-Israeli" Israeli Prime Minister?
August 3rd, 2011
by F. Grey Parker
Did that headline grab ya? Okay, then. Let's back up.
This past May, President Obama was roundly savaged by many of his opponents for daring to repeat one of the standard diplomatic positions of the United States, a position dating back to the Reagan administration and consistently maintained through the Bush 2 regime.
"The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states."
Horrors! How could he? How could someone with a name like Barack Hussein Obama, even if he is Commander in Chief of the armed forces of the United States, dare to think of maintaining policy continuity in international relations?!
The reaction was swift.
by F. Grey Parker
Did that headline grab ya? Okay, then. Let's back up.
This past May, President Obama was roundly savaged by many of his opponents for daring to repeat one of the standard diplomatic positions of the United States, a position dating back to the Reagan administration and consistently maintained through the Bush 2 regime.
"The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states."
Horrors! How could he? How could someone with a name like Barack Hussein Obama, even if he is Commander in Chief of the armed forces of the United States, dare to think of maintaining policy continuity in international relations?!
The reaction was swift.
Labels: Liberal opinion, the hand that feeds you
about face,
Allen west,
anti obama,
crazy,
disconnect,
fatah,
FOX propaganda,
gaza,
gop propaganda,
hamas,
Israel,
Mitt Romney,
netanyahu,
propaganda,
reality,
right wing propaganda,
smears
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Seriously, Mamet? Seriously?
July 26th, 2011
A little over a month ago, I engaged in the profoundly masochistic act of reading David Mamet's most recent book. As rambling, bumbling, and painfully obtuse a portrait of neo-conservative conversion as it is, I didn't consider the possibility that Mamet would, in short order, embarrass himself further. This appears now to have been a terribly misguided overestimation. Since legitimate political and literary observers of all stripes have savaged its inanity, Mamet hasn't exactly had much of a promotional junket.
But, the 700 Club was more than willing to have him on. It's about what one would expect. There are broad character assassinations of "liberal Jews." Regarding American Jews who voted for Obama, Mamet stipulates they should be asked, "are you crazy?" It is, however, when Robertson poses the question "do you think the Jews are ever going to wake up?" that we discover Mamet has become the kind of man who treats such lines of inquiry as legitimate. There is also Mamet's reinterpretation of the biblical plagues... they "were actually sent on the Jews" and not Pharaoh.
It's enough to make one wonder whether he has a full grasp of the concept of self-loathing.
(via)
A little over a month ago, I engaged in the profoundly masochistic act of reading David Mamet's most recent book. As rambling, bumbling, and painfully obtuse a portrait of neo-conservative conversion as it is, I didn't consider the possibility that Mamet would, in short order, embarrass himself further. This appears now to have been a terribly misguided overestimation. Since legitimate political and literary observers of all stripes have savaged its inanity, Mamet hasn't exactly had much of a promotional junket.
But, the 700 Club was more than willing to have him on. It's about what one would expect. There are broad character assassinations of "liberal Jews." Regarding American Jews who voted for Obama, Mamet stipulates they should be asked, "are you crazy?" It is, however, when Robertson poses the question "do you think the Jews are ever going to wake up?" that we discover Mamet has become the kind of man who treats such lines of inquiry as legitimate. There is also Mamet's reinterpretation of the biblical plagues... they "were actually sent on the Jews" and not Pharaoh.
It's enough to make one wonder whether he has a full grasp of the concept of self-loathing.
(via)
Labels: Liberal opinion, the hand that feeds you
700 Club,
conservatism,
David Mamet,
identity,
Israel,
liberalism,
Pat Robertson,
political extremism,
self loathing
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Sullivan Notes The Obvious... Again
May 19th, 2011
Well, President Obama gave another important speech to, and about, the Middle East. Sully notes that the reactions to this relatively cautious, generally uneventful and extraordinarily non-specific performance are almost uniformly flat-out-nuts.
"The meme that a speech that said almost nothing new is a "stunning" attack on Israel is countered on the right with an embrace of the speech by neoconservatives. Yeah: you couldn't make this conservative cognitive dissonance up."
Agreed. I am still trying to figure out what it is that right-wing nuts seem to have heard that wasn't actually said. The full text of the President's prepared remarks follow the video. My only real critique of his message is, basically, way to go. Barack Obama said about as much as any sitting President right this minute could possibly say without making the worst, most hopeless place in the world even more horribly unstable.
Well, President Obama gave another important speech to, and about, the Middle East. Sully notes that the reactions to this relatively cautious, generally uneventful and extraordinarily non-specific performance are almost uniformly flat-out-nuts.
"The meme that a speech that said almost nothing new is a "stunning" attack on Israel is countered on the right with an embrace of the speech by neoconservatives. Yeah: you couldn't make this conservative cognitive dissonance up."
Agreed. I am still trying to figure out what it is that right-wing nuts seem to have heard that wasn't actually said. The full text of the President's prepared remarks follow the video. My only real critique of his message is, basically, way to go. Barack Obama said about as much as any sitting President right this minute could possibly say without making the worst, most hopeless place in the world even more horribly unstable.
Labels: Liberal opinion, the hand that feeds you
Israel,
Middle east,
President Obama,
Presidet Barack Obama
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
The End Of A Paradigm
Feb 2nd, 2011
Thomas Friedman is in Israel. From the NY Times:
"I'm meeting with a retired general at a Tel Aviv hotel. As I take my seat, he begins the conversation with: “Well, everything we thought for the last 30 years is no longer relevant."
That pretty much sums up the disorienting sense of shock and awe that the popular uprising in Egypt has inflicted on the psyche of Israel’s establishment. The peace treaty with a stable Egypt was the unspoken foundation for every geopolitical and economic policy in Israel for the last 35 years, and now it’s gone. It’s as if Americans suddenly woke up and found both Mexico and Canada plunged into turmoil on the same day.
"Everything that once anchored our world is now unmoored," remarked Mark Heller, a Tel Aviv University strategist. "And it is happening right at a moment when nuclearization of the region hangs in the air."
Labels: Liberal opinion, the hand that feeds you
Egypt,
instability,
Israel,
Stability,
unrest
Monday, January 31, 2011
It's Time To Ask
Jan 31st, 2011
How long can the nation of Israel maintain the position that it's very existence is dependent on preserving the oppressive regimes of it's neighbors? Yuval Ben Ami asks the question:
"According to Haaretz, the Israeli government sent a message to world governments urging them to enhance their support of Mubarak’s regime in Egypt. The message urged that the stability of Egypt’s regime is beneficial to the stability of the entire middle east and thus must be preserved.
How long can the nation of Israel maintain the position that it's very existence is dependent on preserving the oppressive regimes of it's neighbors? Yuval Ben Ami asks the question:
"According to Haaretz, the Israeli government sent a message to world governments urging them to enhance their support of Mubarak’s regime in Egypt. The message urged that the stability of Egypt’s regime is beneficial to the stability of the entire middle east and thus must be preserved.
What is the value of our so called democracy if it can only flourish by keeping millions and millions out of democracy’s reach? We have been told for years that such occupation techniques as the construction of the separation barrier are neccesary to ensure the survival of “the Middle East’s only democracy”. We learned to accept that our democracy is dependent on human rights infringements. Now we learn that the scale of these infringements must be fantastically greater.
For 30 years Israel enjoyed the status quo with Egypt, while Egyptians suffered from tyranny, lacked freedom of speech and could not effect their own destiny. What message is Israel sending now? Does it truly imply that only a dictatorial Middle East will permit it to survive as a Jewish state?
Is this Jewish state such a fragile fantasy, that an entire region of the world must be kept imprisoned in order for it to thrive?"
"How many people must be deprived of liberty so we can have ours? Can we only have our liberty by maintaining absolute dictators as allies? Are we really that scared?"
Labels: Liberal opinion, the hand that feeds you
Egypt,
Israel,
neighbors,
oppression,
repression,
Yuval Ben Ami
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






