Please write and send praise, critique, interesting links or random musings to touchthehandthatfeedsyou@yahoo.com
Showing posts with label GOP sabotage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GOP sabotage. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

The Dream Act & Filibuster Abuse

June 19th, 2012

In light of the controversy surrounding the President's recent immigration policy change, it's important to address why the administration was forced to act in the way that it did. Had the DREAM Act come to a vote prior to 2007 it would, in all likelihood, be the law of the land now. Filibuster abuse is the reason it is not.

Via The Center For American Progress
Republicans have transformed the 60 vote majority into the new normal. Ben Frumin and Jason Reif wrote not long ago:
"It's true that there has been a decades-long uptick in the use of cloture filings -- often to overcome filibuster threats -- by whichever party is in the majority, but the best measurement of that trend shows an explosion since Republicans were consigned to minority status after the 2006 election."
If I were a GOP strategist, I would be considering the possibility that retaking the Senate might not be all that it's cracked up to be. Does anyone honestly believe, after the legislative sabotage the GOP has engaged in for the last several years, that the Democrats aren't going to follow their lead and continue to misuse this tactic in the event that the body flips?

Filibuster reform remains the single most important task in returning functionality to this branch. There is no larger institutional threat to representative government today.

Many of the disaffected liberals and progressives grumbling that Obama hasn't accomplished enough of what they expected would be wise to direct their outrage here.

Sunday, May 6, 2012

Quote Of The Day - We Were Warned Edition

May 6th, 2012

Image via
"Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. 

Frankly, these people frighten me. 

Politics and governing demand compromise. 

But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them."

-- Sen. Barry Goldwater reading the Tea leaves quite some time ago.

Sunday, February 26, 2012

The GOP Laws Of Power

Feb 26th, 2012
by Cletis Stump

~ The 1st GOP Law of Power: "The reduction of government services will be met with an equivalent increase of corporate control."

~ The 2nd Law GOP of Power: "Always praise Jesus as your lord and savior when cameras are rolling, otherwise kneel before Mammon."

~ The 3d GOP Law of Power: "When beating the war drum, stress the desire to aid those yearning to be free; never mention their oil."

~ The 4th GOP Law of Power: "Stress patriotism and at all times brand those who oppose our wars of imperialism as socialist agitators"

~ The 5th GOP Law of Power: "Never credit President Obama; deflect the praise when it is brought forth and quickly reference his Muslim father."

~ The 6th GOP Law of Power: "In an election year, back off of any aspect of our agenda the electorate has questioned and change the subject."

~ The 7th GOP Law of Power: "When caught in a lie and all attempts to ignore the public outcry have failed, speak only to Fox News."

~ The 8t GOP Law of Power: "As the economy improves, and unemployment declines, feign outrage over social issues & re engage the culture wars."

~ The 9th GOP Law of Power: "When holding a minority of Senate seats, embrace the filibuster and pass no legislation favorable to the President."

~ The 10th GOP Law of Power: "When President Obama shows grace and courage and refuses to engage in Brinkmanship, double down."

Sunday, February 12, 2012

The GOP Mission To Re-Elect Obama

Feb 12th, 2012

First, there was the Ryan Medicare debacle. Then came the GOP-driven debt ceiling disaster. Now, we have the "conservative" movement waging open war on contraception, a strategy which the vast majority of Americans aren't buying no matter how they frame it. In between these iconoclastic moments, we've had no meaningful legislation drafted in the House, demonization of the working poor, defense of corporations as people and an adherence to a social and economic orthodoxy so rigid that even a majority of registered Republicans oppose it point by point.

Perhaps, Team Obama should be thanking these guys.

Jonathan Chait writes:

"...President Obama has rehabilitated his own political standing in large part by highlighting the opposition of congressional Republicans. The Republican strategy has been to block and delay Obama’s agenda at every turn, and Obama has absorbed most of the backlash from a public that tends to hold the president singularly responsible for all political outcomes. Obama’s campaign of publicly highlighting Republican opposition has simultaneously helped to absolve him of at least part of the blame and made him look more like a strong leader.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Quote Of The Day - Here and Now Edition

Dec 22nd, 2011

"There are only two possible reasons for House Republicans to behave the way they did. Maybe they are so blinded by ideology that they no longer care about the impact their actions might have on struggling American families. Or maybe their only guiding principle is that anything Obama supports, they oppose."

-- Eugene Robinson on the GOP's payroll tax cut fiasco. We covered it HERE, HERE, HERE and HERE

Sunday, November 27, 2011

The Cracks Widen

Nov 27th, 2011

If you haven't yet read David Frum's blistering critique of the modern GOP in NYMag yet, you really need to:

"This past summer, the GOP nearly forced America to the verge of default just to score a point in a budget debate. In the throes of the worst economic crisis since the Depression, Republican politicians demand massive budget cuts and shrug off the concerns of the unemployed. In the face of evidence of dwindling upward mobility and long-stagnating middle-class wages, my party’s economic ideas sometimes seem to have shrunk to just one: more tax cuts for the very highest earners. When I entered Republican politics, during an earlier period of malaise, in the late seventies and early eighties, the movement got most of the big questions—crime, inflation, the Cold War—right. This time, the party is getting the big questions disastrously wrong."

Sure, Frum was booted from the club some time ago for failing to pass its tests in ideological purity. But, he is far from alone. In the last few years, David Stockman, Bruce Bartlett, Andrew Sullivan, Edward Luttwak, John Dean, Mark Zandi, Kenneth Duberstein and hundreds of other thinkers who once comprised the brain trust of American conservatism have been made to feel unwelcome for refusing to propagandize. While I certainly don't agree with Frum's declaration that conservatives got 'the big questions... right' decades ago, I will agree that they offered rational proposals and didn't try to collapse the deliberative power of the Senate.

In part, Frum's piece is a form of psychoanalysis:

"... conscious cynicism is much rarer than you might suppose. Few of us have the self-knowledge and emotional discipline to say one thing while meaning another. If we say something often enough, we come to believe it. We don’t usually delude others until after we have first deluded ourselves. Some of the smartest and most sophisticated people I know—canny investors, erudite authors—sincerely and passionately believe that President Barack Obama has gone far beyond conventional American liberalism and is willfully and relentlessly driving the United States down the road to socialism. No counterevidence will dissuade them from this belief: not record-high corporate profits, not almost 500,000 job losses in the public sector, not the lowest tax rates since the Truman administration. It is not easy to fit this belief alongside the equally strongly held belief that the president is a pitiful, bumbling amateur, dazed and overwhelmed by a job too big for him—and yet that is done too."

The cognitive dissonance Frum describes now extends to even the simplest of arguments; There are no jobs because of Obama can be followed, after a single breath, with declarations that the unemployed are lazy.

There are ways out using traditional conservative ideas, but, as Frum laments, the GOP is simply disinterested.

"Rather than workable solutions, my party is offering low taxes for the currently rich and high spending for the currently old, to be followed by who-knows-what and who-the-hell-cares. This isn’t conservatism; it’s a going-out-of-business sale for the baby-boom generation."

And that, as they say, is that.

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Obstructionist policies

Nov 23rd, 2011
by Nicole Zimmerer

"Voters kept telling reporters and polltakers that their fundamental concerns - about economic growth and job security, health care and their children's education - were not being addressed by politicians... All these things are true. But both despite and because of them, there are grounds for hope for the future of American politics. Popular anger at politics is, in fact, a thoroughly healthy sign, an indication that our democracy is going through one of its periodic phases of self-correction. … politics dominated by false choices and phony issues is something very much worth being angry about. That anger is beginning to have an impact." EMPHASIS ADDED
-- E.J. Dionne, Jr from 1992's Why Americans Hate Politics

Perennial concerns. The only difference between political parties is how they address these concerns. While "compassionate" conservatives call for privatization and deregulation, they do so while at an economic and social advantage over those whose lives will be devastated by such policies. They tend to take the side of faceless corporate entities, and as history has proven, these entities do not have human concerns, they merely care about the bottom line. Im not claiming that the liberal left has perfect policies, but they are slightly more grounded in reality and take more into account than simply numbers on a piece of paper. They tend to take the human variable into account.

Image via Addicting Info
Take US Crane, LLC, for example. Addicting Info reports that owner Bill Looman has added a commentary to his company vehicles in the form of a sign that states: NEW COMPANY POLICY: WE ARE NOT HIRING UNTIL OBAMA IS GONE.


Monday, November 14, 2011

Worth 1,000 Words

Nov 14th, 2011

Yup...

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Worth 1,000 Words

Nov 6th, 2011

Friday, October 28, 2011

More Wheels Spinning...

Oct 28th, 2011

Or smoke and mirrors... pick any similar metaphor.

From HuffPost Hill:
"GOP TARGETS OWN NON-IMPLEMENTED LAW - House Republicans pivoted to #jobs today, they said, bringing to the floor legislation targeting a three percent withholding. Get rid of that withholding, they said, and you'll create #jobs. (Or job creators will, but you get the picture.) But the withholdingwas initially passed into law by the Republican majority in 2006, with the GOP supporting it 229 to 2. Democrats subsequently delayed its implementation. It's currently scheduled to go into effect in 2013, so the GOP's onslaught was against a law that exists only in theory and only thanks to them. (Boehner's office says the initial withholding was one part of a bigger bill, so the roll call isn't that meaningful. Our office says: Whatever!)"

This sums up what's wrong with just about everything.

Friday, October 14, 2011

Worth 1,000 Words

Oct 14th, 2011

Monday, October 3, 2011

Obama's "Nemesis"

Oct 3rd, 2011

Jason Zengerle profiles House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) for New York Magazine. It's an ugly portrait of a very unprincipled man.

"Cantor’s role as Obama’s nemesis, as the National Review recently dubbed him, is remarkable for several reasons—none more so than the fact that, although he’s now the darling of the tea party, he initially rose to power in Washington by standing for almost everything the tea party is against..."

"Cantor’s primary job as a member of the whip operation was to cajole his fellow Republican congressmen into voting for many of the bills the tea-partiers now decry as the height of fiscal irresponsibility —including, most infamously, the 2003 Medicare prescription-drug legislation, for which he worked hand in hand with pharmaceutical-industry lobbyists and Karl Rove."


The article traces Cantor's self-transformation from establishment stooge to, well, stealth establishment stooge. It is amazing that someone so committed to preserving corporatist exploitation and defending outright waste in non-social spending has managed to dupe the GOP rank and file into believing that he is fighting for fiscal sensibility.

An interesting aside in the article actually shines a very bright light on just how Cantor has accomplished this. What's more, it also illustrates how he has marginalized Speaker Boehner while, at the same time, securing his general control over the radical, Tea Party driven newcomers who stormed into Congress last year.

"I can text Cantor and get a response back in minutes," says one freshman, explaining his allegiance. "I don’t know if Speaker Boehner even has a cell phone."

These freshman are his to control. They go home and tell their constituents his version of events. Their own narratives have been subsumed.

This is Eric Cantor's grand strategy... for Eric Cantor.

He has created and now wields a barely visible intra-party political machine. His continuing consolidation of power is impressive. His ability to call upon it to obstruct and sabotage both sides of the aisle raises the very real possibility that, as the title of Zengerle's implies, we are actually living in "Cantor's America."

Monday, September 12, 2011

GOP Sabotaging America, Ctd...

Sept, 12th 2011

Of course it's sabotage. Anyone who is still arguing that it's not is either lying to you or, worse, they are deceiving themselves. Yglesias shines the light:

"Marin Cogan and Jake Sherman have done the only reporting that really needs to be done on the prospects for major legislation aimed at creating jobs, or doing anything else:
"Obama is on the ropes; why do we appear ready to hand him a win?" said one senior House Republican aide who requested anonymity to discuss the matter freely.
Public policy is not a zero-sum competition between “Republican ideas” and “Democratic ideas,” but electoral competition is a zero-sum battle for office. In a paradigm where the passage of major legislation counts as a “win” for President Obama then anyone who wants to see President Obama go down to defeat, then no major legislation can pass on a bipartisan basis. This is exactly the problem the White House had in trying to overcome GOP filibusters during the 111th Congress and the main problem they face in trying to reach bipartisan accords with the Republican-led House of Representatives in the 112th Congress. This is the fundamental reality of American politics today, but far too few people put it at the center of their accounts of what’s happening."

This is the wealthiest federal legislature per capita since the late 1930s. I think that is becoming a serious issue. Let's face it, in the short term the worst that can actually happen to them is that they spend a few years slightly less rich. I think it is ironic for a party that continues to demonize the poor for not "having skin in the game" to have so little skin in the game.

The Continuing Republican Disconnect

Sept 12th, 2011

Jacob Weisberg pretty much nails the current disconnect between the policy positions of elected Republicans and traditional economics:

"There is no question that the current Republican position is eccentric as a matter of economics. Pick up any standard economics textbook, and it will explain how governments respond to cyclical downturns with temporary deficit spending. In Keynesian terms, boosting aggregate demand increases GDP growth and reduces unemployment. Conversely, cutting government spending during a slowdown tends to make matters worse. There may be circumstances in which temporary spending isn't possible, or where cutting government spending does not have the typical contractionary effect. But a thorough IMF study conducted last year concluded that "fiscal consolidation" does tend to have the predictable impact: shrinking GDP and raising unemployment."

Unfortunately, the House GOP has already signaled its intention to do everything they can to keep the economy stagnant. In response to the release of the President's jobs bill, the full text of which is available HERE, Eric Cantor had this to say according to TPM:

"Anything that is akin to the stimulus bill I think is not going to be acceptable to the American people," Cantor told reporters at his weekly Capitol briefing Monday. "I don't believe that our members are going to be interested in pursuing that. I certainly am not."

Of course Mr. Cantor is not interested. However, Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody's, is very interested and he put together this chart Mr. Cantor should read. It's unusual for Mr. Zandi to compose a graphic so simplistic it could be considered droll. Perhaps that's just what the GOP needs... economic cliff notes.

Saturday, September 3, 2011

Quote Of The Day - Here and Now Edition

Sept 3rd, 2011

"Over the last four decades, the Republican Party has transformed from a loyal opposition into an insurrectionary party that flouts the law when it is in the majority and threatens disorder when it is the minority."

-- John B. Judis, senior editor for The New Republic, telling it like it is not long ago.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Worth 1,000 Words

Aug 23rd, 2011


Thursday, August 18, 2011

Worth 1,000 Words

Aug 18th, 2011

via
© copyright 2011 Bennett / Chattanooga Times Free Press

 


Thursday, August 4, 2011

It was NEVER "Jobs, Jobs, Jobs"

August 4th, 2011

I can still hear it. The refrain from the GOP leading into the 2010 midterms was "jobs, jobs, jobs." That they didn't mean it or, worse, actually were going to do everything in their power to damage the economy further for traction in 2012 seemed clear to some of us at the time.

Here are some reminders and a recap of the GOP's push from PoliticsUSA:

"Earlier in the year when House Speaker John Boehner was told that the spending cuts Republicans proposed would cost one million jobs, he said, “So be it.” Apparently Mr. Boehner thought it was more important to cut essential aid programs than create jobs, and it was flippant of him to say in effect, so what. Republicans have no intention of ever creating any jobs even though they lied in 2010 and promised it would be their highest priority. Jobs are still on Boehner’s mind though because when President Obama proposed a balanced approach to addressing the nation’s deficit, Boehner accused the president of attempting to “raise taxes on the job creators.” For most Republicans, the only time jobs are important is when they can make a reference to tax increases on the filthy rich and corporations.

Last year when Democrats attempted to pass a jobs bill, Republicans in the Senate blocked the measure for no other reason than it was not their bill. The bill gave tax breaks and incentives to small businesses for new job hires, but Republicans were anxious to deny Democrats any more legislative accomplishments before the midterm elections. When President Obama and Democrats attempted to eliminate tax breaks for companies that move Americans’ jobs to Korea, India, and China, Republicans blocked the bill because it did not reward corporate outsourcing. Prior to a vote on the outsourcing bill, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce president made the rounds on news programs to tout the benefits of shipping Americans’ jobs overseas to corporations. Republicans said that removing tax breaks from companies that outsource jobs would stifle job creation. Yes, they said it and it is proof there is no sense of shame with these job-killing Republicans; why any American voted for them in 2010 is a mystery unless one figures in the racial element. It is becoming more evident every day that Republicans cannot stand the fact that there is a Black man sitting in the Oval Office and if hurting the President means eliminating more Americans’ jobs, then as John Boehner says, so be it."

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

It's Regional

August 2nd, 2011

One of the reasons many of us don't see the same level of Tea Party activism in our midst as others do is apparently dependent on where we live. Michael Lind writes for Salon:

"The mainstream media have completely missed the story, by portraying the Tea Party movement in ideological rather than regional terms. Whether by accident or design, the public faces of the Tea Party in the House are Midwesterners -- Minnesota's Michele Bachmann and Joe Walsh of Illinois. But while there may be Tea Party sympathizers throughout the country, in the House of Representatives the Tea Party faction that has used the debt ceiling issue to plunge the nation into crisis is overwhelmingly Southern in its origins."

Here's an even more dramatic view.

Friday, July 29, 2011

Quote Of The Day - Here and Now Edition

July 29th, 2011

"But making nebulous calls for centrism, like writing news reports that always place equal blame on both parties, is a big cop-out — a cop-out that only encourages more bad behavior. The problem with American politics right now is Republican extremism, and if you’re not willing to say that...

you’re helping make that problem worse."
-- Paul Krugman on the absurdity of calling for compromise with radicals