Please write and send praise, critique, interesting links or random musings to

Saturday, October 9, 2010


Oct 9th, 2010

Rachel Maddow analyzes the effects of unlimited and anonymous campaign spending:

"The idea that a candidate is too kooky to be elected is only true in an environment in which there is not unlimited money to be spent to make that person seem less than kooky. But when the money is quite literally unlimited either by actual dollar ceilings or by the shame associated with being seen to donate that money, there is no ceiling on how kooky a candidate can be and still seem electable. As long as the money can go to infinity, so can the kook factor. The chart goes on to infinity and beyond.
This is the new reality of American politics."

No comments:

Post a Comment